the_paradox_of_atonement_5
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| the_paradox_of_atonement_5 [2026/04/27 23:12] – iam | the_paradox_of_atonement_5 [2026/07/23 12:11] (current) – iam | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| + | <WRAP justify> | ||
| The fact that men lived was proof positive that they were at-one with God. They were in tune with the Infinite. This new idealism was paradoxical to everything they had ever heard before, and so Jesus found it necessary to explain the abstract idea in simplest terms. | The fact that men lived was proof positive that they were at-one with God. They were in tune with the Infinite. This new idealism was paradoxical to everything they had ever heard before, and so Jesus found it necessary to explain the abstract idea in simplest terms. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
| The priests were valueless. The Sacred Book was misleading and confusing. It was imperative to “Abide in me, and let my words abide in you, then ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done.” In other words, Jesus insisted that they discard their old teachings, even their sacred scriptures and take His teachings | The priests were valueless. The Sacred Book was misleading and confusing. It was imperative to “Abide in me, and let my words abide in you, then ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done.” In other words, Jesus insisted that they discard their old teachings, even their sacred scriptures and take His teachings | ||
| + | </ | ||
the_paradox_of_atonement_5.1777331562.txt.gz · Last modified: by iam